Reuven Feuerstein, Romanian Jewish educator, developed the theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability, stating that all people may have developed their learning potential. In his theory, he developed ten criteria considered as puzzle pieces that contribute to the reality of mediated learning experience, where the educator's role is fundamental and indispensable in the process of teaching and student learning. Feuerstein studies are known in many countries and pose a challenge for educators working with people with special needs and learning difficulties.
Sunday, March 29, 2009
Dry White Spot On Dog's Nose
Reuven Feuerstein, Romanian Jewish educator, developed the theory of Structural Cognitive Modifiability, stating that all people may have developed their learning potential. In his theory, he developed ten criteria considered as puzzle pieces that contribute to the reality of mediated learning experience, where the educator's role is fundamental and indispensable in the process of teaching and student learning. Feuerstein studies are known in many countries and pose a challenge for educators working with people with special needs and learning difficulties.
Strange Nipple Images
Friday, March 27, 2009
Drinking Guinness Can Cause The Stools To Be Dark
In his book about this and that when dealing with Nature and artificialeza in humans, in the epilogue states that:
If you believe that this point is important, let me ask you can get on these two positions?
Until then communication you send to MAD so that it could acquit through his television. He responded by this means but I sent an email that in essence, as is reasonable and appropriate, was the same as said on TV. Overall this was the mail:
"... I simply send a copy of my work," Do we want really change? "I think at this point or these Honduras I would have to reduce potential construction area of \u200b\u200b10 square meters. Haber said, as I-25 square meters was too optimistic. "
Marco Aurelio Denegri
REALLY WANT" CHANGE ?
Ching Hai, the Taiwanese master who achieved lighting, they say, the Himalayas and who is considered a living Buddha, is stirring the spiritual roost in the East as in the West for several years, about twenty.
Their method, essentially Buddhist requires, among other things, entirely vegetarian diet and positive spirit, we must meditate, contemplate, reflect and want of spiritual transformation or enlightenment or great existential change vehemently and despair. Ching Hai
exemplifies the latter referring to a very interesting history of Zen Buddhism. Zenica is a very vivid story, I mean, really effective in terms of message. Consists on page 36 of the number 94 issue of The Supreme Master Ching Hai News (News from Supreme Master Ching Hai). History Zenica
referring Ching Hai is as follows:
A Zen disciple asked his teacher how you can enlightenment, and his teacher tells him that wishing it so much, then the disciple asks him about it a lot: "Ah," says the master, "come with me, come with me to the river."
reach the river and the teacher tells the disciple goal head completely under water, that it sinks in it and hold your breath. The disciple obeyed, but after half a minute, needing to breathe, want to take the lead, but the teacher immediately then it sinks again. Then it starts all a struggle, of increasing intensity, between the disciple who wants to get the head and the teacher who does not want to serve. The disciple swallow water, desperate, kick, begin to suffer from drowning and drowning when the teacher picks it up and taken out of water. The disciple, faint, exhausted, panting, arrives to tell his teacher gasped:
"Master, why did this to me? I almost drowned, I almost died. "
The teacher said
" I did it because I wanted you to despair. Now wanting desperately to understand that only the illumination gain it. If you're not desperate, then you will never light up. "
Know that for those who do not feel well, this is, for most of the people, are entirely valid the following considerations of the famous existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre:
"We are far from our situation will change," says Sartre, in Being and Nothingness (1943) - . What is more, it even seems that we are not even able to change ourselves. I'm not 'free' to escape the fate of my class, my nation or my family or to build my power or my fortune, nor to overcome my bias or insignificant habits. I am born workers, French, hereditary syphilis or tuberculosis. The story of a life-whatever-is history of failure.
[...] "Before 'made' man seems 'made' by climate and land, race, class, language, history of the community as part of the inheritance, the particular circumstances of his childhood, of habit, large or small events of his life. "
(Walter Biemel, Sartre. Barcelona, \u200b\u200bSalvat, 1986, 125.)
Gurdjieff said quite rightly that in our life we best efforts to make no effort. Certerísimo.
Desrutinizarse and begin the long and laborious process of change and transformation ontological existential is for the common man, ie for 90 percent of the world, something as unattractive as it would for a lazy famous flee quickly to the approaching danger of a snake. In effect, this slave of sloth, rather than try to flee, would rather ask what you should antidote against snake venom.
Sincerémonos: rather than give up our comfort, we would prefer cliffs and perish. Neither more nor less than Baralt when railed against the government term. "Everything you try, he said, everything is done, less write such a word, less pronounced, at least include you in the Dictionary of the Academy. Before it perish, and perish the tongue, and perish all. "(Rafael María Baralt, Dictionary of Galice. Madrid, Imprenta Nacional, 1855, sv" Government ".)
Arthur Koestler (1905-1983) states that once was willing to die, but not to resign (though it was dangerous the unavoidable) the warmth and comfort that provided temporary home of a friend. The story has been told it has been reported Koestler and Erich Fromm. Let's see what it tells us about it.
"In life," writes Fromm-would require such enormous changes, people prefer to sacrifice a future catastrophe I would have to do today. The description by Arthur Koestler's something that happened during the English Civil War is an outstanding example of this common attitude:
"Koestler was the comfortable villa of a friend when she was told of Franco troops advanced. Arrive during the night and most likely he would be killed. Could be saved away, but the night was cold and rainy, and warm and comfortable home. Decided to stay and took him prisoner. Several weeks later, and almost miraculously escaped death thanks to the efforts of some journalist friends.
"This will also involve those who prefer to risk dying which presumably undergo a review reveals a serious illness that would require a major surgery. "
(Erich Fromm, To have or be? Thirteenth reprint of the first edition in English. Mexico, Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1998, 29.)
Boat-shaped Wedding Dress
This reflects the solidarity and the desire to succeed and not have everything you need to survive.
The characters in this story are ZAHRA ALI. All started when Ali loses his sister's shoes, she waited anxiously for him to come to see as they had to die, but when he arrived was that the surprise had been lost, have no other solution to all they could do was use Ali's shoes, wear the shoes of Ali but left to study as a study in the morning and one afternoon at the basis of this t this to the sister does not like to much and that she was very ugly and they were very dirty, this new right of Ali and Zahra was very hard because one studied morning and one afternoon at this base had to make some efforts to stop any efforts to study these were that Ali had to be faster every day if I wanted to arrive early to school but as we look for more always late to run this will cause problems with the rector, as he was such a good student this will help. After he realizes that there is a contest of athletics and in the prizes, one is a pair of shoes you choose to participate do everything possible to win the race and it showed that the fall is when you want something fight for it to achieve no matter the efforts is to do all that interested for at this time was the prize but not the first but of convenience. What it shows is that maybe in life there are people fighting for things that do not want them but whether you play for any reason and that we must put ourselves in the shoes of others so we know the sacrifices that many people done only for survival.
This also shows him as there are certain blocks in children of this reason that sometimes makes finding is repressed by a low status in society, another may be the life that led her parents are, how they want their lived children do.
in any part of our life can reveal the racial and socioeconomic discrimination, for those who have more or less, you can also see that the richer people are the boss and are essential at any time but often have much money makes us happy.
Hpt18-60compatible Replacement Thermostat
Alejandro Grimson.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Sample Anniversary Note
The third approach is the model of information processing, which examines the steps, actions and progressive operations that take place when people receive, perceive, remember, think and use information. These approaches are embedded into two streams: Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Science, which from the theoretical point of view certain features that distinguish them.
cognitive processes are determining factors in learning, there are different techniques that facilitate such learning, currently within the most used are Mind Mapping, Concept Maps.
ConceptualesEstrategia Mind Maps and developed by British psychologist Tony Buzan in the early 70's. It is a tool enabling the storage, organization and presentation of information in order to facilitate learning processes, management and organizational planning and decision making.
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Skirt Pattern 36 Waist
When criticism is heading towards the condition postmodern life is branded as a retrograde, conservative, traditionalist, obtuse, etc. However, when it intends to point out the drawbacks of an uncritical adoption of the "benefits" of the technological age, no proposal is set far back as a condition of life forms such as the quaternary horde sitting around fire, eating with your hands, covering our bodies with skins and where tradition and knowledge is transferred exclusively orally. Nor is that each of us having to become a contemplative ascetics and our main hobbies are reading The Iliad and The Odyssey in Greek or dedicate the art of cultivating bonsai. No, that's not the idea. No need to radicalize the issue, but that's what you're doing when or defend at all costs the disbanding technological or advocates a return to prehistoric life forms.
On the other hand, some say, "Is it not necessary to achieve a studio dedicated technology, ongoing research and painstaking experimentation. How can you tell us more stupid if you have achieved impressive technologies? "For two situations occur. The first is that those who study, experiment and investigate the technology are a tiny group of people compared to the millions who use them and the adopt-a-blind in their daily lives. The second thing is that technological development and other development. Both move at speeds totally outdated. The greater the advancement of technology the greater the progress of impersonality, and there is nothing to do if one has not realized before this case. And Konrad Lorenz had said in his The Eight Deadly Sins of Civilized Humanity 1973: "The jurisdiction of humanity itself which drives the technological development to our disadvantage, men obfuscate the value appraisal of all real and being robbed of time should be devoted to genuine reflection of human activity. " In an article devoted to analyze the work above Ursúa Nicanor (Ludus Vitalis, vol. XIII, no. 24, 2005, pp. 165-180) says "We have already noted the ability to reflect, now a vanishing value, human beings have and how this human capacity be developed to analyze the entire whole, as 'a being that ceases to reflect risks losing all specifically human qualities and skills' (Lorenz, 1973). Faced with brutal competition, both individually and collectively that we are witnessing, can only proceed, according to Lorenz, 'by revolutionary measures, or at least by a sobering transmutation of all values apparent that both are revered today. " Before the have must be enhance universal values \u200b\u200band education to develop the whole person. " So we are ladies and gentlemen. On the one hand, with regard to technology, that is, the set of skills that allow us to build things differently and leave the environment, we shine like the sun on the other, with regard to its relationship with itself and with Moreover, the human being remains as precarious as ten thousand years ago: Violence at its best (we have become artists in relation to the massive destruction, but from time to time and isolation go back to our primitive methods murder to avoid being bored in the monotonous action triggers and push buttons), samples of obsequiousness and frightening subject and all forms of discrimination and isolation, the latter so characteristic of the animal kingdom that craved differentiate but still belong and with honors . We could say that relate to what we eficientísimos impersonal, relationships with others are deficientísimos. In the words of N. Ursúa "If the scientific and technological development beyond the capacity of moral and ethical development, can we survive? Is it not time to act now so we can live in a more human world and spend from thought to action, an action-packed human and social values? ".
Those who have read or listened to Andres Oppenheimer know what I'm referring to. His latest book Chinese Tales is an apology to globalization. The book has a very clear writing but then you can find some flaws in the argument: the author is a strong advocate of globalization, does not mention one drawback about it (and go any) and what damage the environment? He never spoke of it. For Oppenheimer, China is the perfect prototype for growth but does every country in the world can grow, so As things stand? And yet, what to grow indefinitely? Few would argue that the author is fair, but it is certain that this was not the intention. The names of some of the chapters of his book speak for themselves: "More technical, less sociologists " or "Sobran psychologists, engineers are missing." I have engineers and technologists everywhere is not a solution. But psychologists have not bubbling. Ultimately become a country with technological growth need not be inextricably linked with the decline of professional social and human sciences. It is likely with more engineers and fewer social scientists in a country with educational level as ours, things go bad, or worse. Not a question of quantity but quality (and is annoying to say this, listen more). Could revitalize the educational system, to develop innovative research, to make young people interested in the university and academic excellence, concern for merit and not by the mob and it is likely that things will go better. That better not be because they need it and stay here again because it will be well. And finally as: Why are more students of the humanities, social sciences, law and fewer students engineering? Let's discuss about this question and we will see the conclusions ...
The worsening of the human condition is something patent. If we do not accept it because we want, we take land and go to sleep. Think of where we want to, think that sometimes science fiction is no longer just think about one another why we get along so badly and why with stones, metals or inorganic anything we have a wonderful relationship. Nietzsche, in his Human, All Too Human , said who we are as much at home in nature is that it has no opinion about us. Hopefully not the explanation why this is happening, if so would not only resign.
Sunday, March 15, 2009
How To Tell If You Have Fake Uggs Moccasins
Excellent documentary. If you have 13 minutes to spare, watch it carefully. It's worth anyway.
Monday, March 9, 2009
How To Make Energy Ring
Regarding the violence, it is valid to consider the following: Why do we act aggressively humans? What makes us turn against each other, with unparalleled brutality even in the most ferocious predators? Scientists and scholars from various fields have pondered this question for centuries and have proposed different explanations for the paradox of human violence (Baron and Byrne, 1998). Violence has always existed, violence to survive and violence to control the power and violence to rebel against domination, physical and psychological violence.
In the Middle Ages and up to s. XVI, ie, from St. Augustine to John Calvin, it was argued that the Creator was not responsible of the existence of evil, but man. It is in the XVI and XVIII where Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau respectively, cemented the foundation for the two major trends that explain the genesis of violence human. Hobbes believed that men were aggressive, selfish and greedy by nature. The sinister conclusion Hobbes, homo homini lupus (man is a wolf to man), was quoted by leading researchers of man: Niccolo Machiavelli (centuries before Hobbes), Nietzsche, Darwin, Freudian psychoanalysis and ethology School formed by Konrad Lorenz, as Hobbes argued that violence is inherent to mankind and that aggression is innate. In contrast, Rousseau theorized that man was naturally good, that society corrupted this goodness and, therefore, the person was not born evil but did perverse. Were the parents of Scientific Socialism, The psychologist Albert Bandura in his social learning theory and the anthropologist Ashley Montagu for whom the aggressiveness of men is not a reaction but an answer, who agreed with eighteenth-century French philosopher. They argue that culture establishes aggressive patterns and learn aggression by observing how others act, the life we \u200b\u200bare exposed to models of aggression in all areas of life (Hergenhahn, 2001). Bandura, social learning psychologist says: "People are not born with aggressive behavior repertoires prefabricated, they should be taught in one form or another" (Bandura, 1975).
Even with all this, the discussion of innate or acquired character of human violence, being the subject of controversy, it takes too much time and effort to reach an endpoint. References
Bandura, A. (1975). Social learning analysis of aggression. In Bandura, A. and Ribes, E. Behavior modification, analysis of aggression and delinquency (pp. 307-347). Mexico City: Trillas. R. BARON
and Byrne, D. (1998). Social psychology. (8ava. Ed.) New York: Prentice Hall.
HERGENHAHN, BR (2001). Introduction to the History of psychology. Madrid: Auditorium.
PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION (2002). World report on violence and health: summary. Washington, DC: PAHO
Sunday, March 8, 2009
Sailboat Boom Rigging Diagrams
In one Articles Eco speaks of the imprint left on the life and work of Norberto Bobbio, Italian philosopher and thinker. Eco says following a few quotes and phrases he heard of the philosopher: "These few quotes are enough for me, a young reader at the time, became the quintessence of my personal ideas on the notion of engagement ... "We can not doubt that
Umberto Eco is a prominent figure and member of pro viso and society. Congratulations on your main influences came from thinkers such as Norberto Bobbio. At the end of the article Eco lets talk Bobbio and endorses his words entirely:
"I am a pessimist illustrated. I am, so to speak, an illustrator who has learned the lesson of Hobbes, De Maistre, Machiavelli and Marx. I think also that the pessimistic approach is more appropriate for the man illustrated the optimistic view. The optimist always involves a certain dose of enthusiasm, and enlightened man should not be enthusiastic. And there are also optimists who believe that history is indeed a drama but a drama with a happy ending. I only know that history is a drama, but do not know, because I can not know, a drama with a happy ending. Optimists are the others, who like Gabriel Peri, who, dying gloriously he wrote: 'soon will prepare the mornings sing. " The mornings have arrived, but the songs we have not heard. And when I look around me I hear no songs but roaring.
would not want this statement of pessimism to be understood as a gesture of resignation. It is a healthy act of austerity after so many orgies of optimism, a prudent refusal to participate in the feast of rhetoric forever holidays. It is an act of satiety rather than disgust. And besides, pessimism does not bridle the industry, but the routes and better directed to its target. Between the optimist whose maxim is: 'Do not do anything, you'll see how everything works out' and the pessimist replies, 'Do what you have to do, but things go from bad to worse ', I prefer the second, [...] do not say that the optimists will always be fools, but fools are always optimistic. I can not separate in my mind the blind trust in the providence historical or theological vanity who believes he is the center of the world and that everything happens for his suggestion. Respect and appreciation, however, that works well without asking for assurances that the world will improve and no waiting, no awards or even say confirmations. Only the great pessimist is able to act with a clear mind, with the determined, with a sense of humility and complete dedication to duty. "
From that moment Eco autodenominaría, like Bobbio, "Pessimistic Illustrated."
for any reason will not try to proclaim the same way as those illustrious personalities. Go stupidity. But I ascribe to this line of action, than the pessimism Illustrated. But were otherwise not have as guides to EM Cioran, F. Nietzsche, K Lorenz, BF Skinner and Marco Aurelio Denegri.